LETTER

Lucerne: build lanes for those who actually use them!

 

Interesting how this topic bothers so many. However, the points remain: increased traffic on main arteries (i.e. Lucerne); the few-and-far-between cyclists who support new bike lines along Lucerne (i.e., have we not learned from the cyclist accidents in Ottawa); and the lack of Gatineau’s urban planning (i.e., how much green space will the city forgo while not supporting its citizens’ transit needs).

In response to Bulletin comments by Bob and Richard (Oct. 19 and 26), I think both are valid but need clarification. A third (auto) lane is needed along Lucerne Blvd., but will that actually solve Aylmer’s gridlock? No, it will only decrease the traffic from Aylmer Rd. to Lucerne briefly. The question we should ask is why does our growing city have so few plans for transit innovation in Aylmer?  Since city amalgamation, more thought has gone into transit for greater Gatineau; we get only “talk” on our side of this broken city!

In response to Richard Jodoin’s cycling comments, I note that city consultations on winter cycling commuters vs vehicular winter traffic do not support his view. Winter cyclists on Lucerne represent very few individuals. Moreover, the likelihood of vehicle-bike accidents on this busy road during morning/evening traffic increases exponentially. If Ottawa is rethinking bike lanes and cyclist safety, why would our city not do the same?

As for paying taxes, we all pay our share, but until our city develops an innovative urban transit system in Aylmer, we will continue to have gridlocks, road rage, and bike-car accidents. I would rather pay my taxes for services that are used by more than a select few. (PS: I am a cyclist!)

Dan Riendeau, Aylmer